Council Tax following abandonment

Tony A
Tony A
0 Thanks
8 Posts
10 years ago
Using the RLA AST when the fixed period ends it becomes a statutory periodic. The old agreement created a contractual periodic. There appear to be two problems with a statutory periodic.
1 Local authorities have used the stop start nature of the agreement as a grounds for saying that the agreement has been interrupted and a tenant who has abandoned the property under a statutory periodic is no longer in residence and thus the owner is liable for Council Tax under the CT liability hierarchy. See Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin)
2 for the same reasons deposit protection prescribed information may need reserving under an SPT but some (Including Alan Ward) think that this would not be required under a contractual periodic tenancy.

What are the relative pros and cons of creating statutory versus contractual periodic tenancies at the end of the fixed period please?

Please Login

You must be logged in to participate in our forums, to continue please login below.

Not a member? From only £85 you can join in the discussion and get access to member's only resources and services.

As the home for landlords, the NRLA are here to help you save time, save money, and stay compliant. NRLA membership gives you access to a vast range of expertise, resources, and exclusive member benefits and savings, designed to help and empower members. We also play a pivotal role in campaigning and championing the interests of landlords.